Re: Squeeze backport suite names (was Re: New Backports Suite created)
* Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com> [2010-10-05 17:57:48 CEST]:
> OK, I really don't want prolong this discussion since there is
> obviously way too much inertia. I accept the current system as is for
> lenny. However, would it be possible to consider/debate this for
> squeeze-backports-* since those suites have yet to be set up?
Like I responded before, no it won't get renamed because you see it
imperfect. lenny doesn't speak for itself, nor does squeeze.
If you kindly could start to accept that you have your own point of
view that is different from the people running the service and stop the
bikeshedding, that would be fine.
This will be my last response on this topic, thanks for understanding.
Rhonda [with backports hat on]
Reply to: