Re: Package version suffix

[Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org>]

On Wed, 08 Sep 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:

> Romain Francoise <rfrancoise@debian.org> writes:
> 
> > The contribute page still recommends using ~bpo as the version suffix
> > for backported packages. Since we can't switch to ~bdo for now (it's
> > less than ~bpo), maybe we should adopt an official numbering scheme for
> > backports, like ~lenny+1, or something?
> 
> It just stands for BackPOrts now, instead of BackPorts.Org.  :)

I thought it stood for backports.debian.org, with the p just being a
backwards d.

-- 
                           |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
      Peter Palfrader      | : :' :      The  universal
 http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `'      Operating System
                           |   `-    http://www.debian.org/