[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: subversion (updated package) [lenny-backports, 1.6.12dfsg-1~bpo50+2]



On 2010-06-28 16:44, Michael Diers wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.12dfsg-1~bpo50+2
> of my package "subversion".
> 
> subversion (1.6.12dfsg-1~bpo50+2) lenny-backports; urgency=medium
> 
>   * Rebuild for lenny-backports.
>   * Disable ra_serf, need a newer version than the one in lenny.
>   * Build-depend on libdb4.6-dev, suggest db4.6-util.
>   * Build-depend on openjdk-6-jdk instead of gcj-jdk.
>   * Depend on openjdk-6-jre-headless instead of gij.
>   * control: Fix version control URLs.
> 
>  -- Michael Diers <mdiers@elego.de>  Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:13:50 +0200
> 
> It builds these binary packages:
> libapache2-svn - Subversion server modules for Apache
> libsvn-dev - Development files for Subversion libraries
> libsvn-doc - Developer documentation for libsvn
> libsvn-java - Java bindings for Subversion
> libsvn-perl - Perl bindings for Subversion
> libsvn-ruby - Ruby bindings for Subversion (dummy package)
> libsvn-ruby1.8 - Ruby bindings for Subversion
> libsvn1    - Shared libraries used by Subversion
> python-subversion - Python bindings for Subversion
> subversion - Advanced version control system
> subversion-tools - Assorted tools related to Subversion
> 
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subversion
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
> main contrib non-free
> - dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subversion/subversion_1.6.12dfsg-1~bpo50+2.dsc
> 
> Version Control System:
> - VCS: svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-subversion/src/lenny-backports-1.6.x/
> - VCS browser:
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-subversion/src/lenny-backports-1.6.x/
> 
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Dear mentors and backporters,

has anyone had a chance to look at the new Subversion backport? Is there
anything wrong with the package?

I would appreciate some sort of feedback.

Thank you.

Cheers,

-- 
Michael Diers, elego Software Solutions GmbH, http://www.elego.de

Reply to: