Re: Conflict with lmms and BPO's wine (conflicting wine-bin)

To: Roy Berkeveld <roy@tnode.net>
Cc: backports-users@lists.backports.org
Subject: Re: Conflict with lmms and BPO's wine (conflicting wine-bin)
From: Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:39:49 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20100601073948.GA7789@nelson.snow-crash.org>
In-reply-to: <4C002945.2090201@tnode.net>
References: <4C002945.2090201@tnode.net>

Roy Berkeveld schrieb am Friday, den 28. May 2010:

> Hi,
> 
> The wine 1.0.4{0..2}~winehq1-1 packages all conflict wine-bin. The
> Debian package lmms (0.4.6-1) has a dependency on wine-bin and not wine
> (no specific version), which breaks simultaneous install of wine from
> BPO and lmms from Debian Squeeze.
Hu? 
 rmadison -u bpo wine-bin
   wine-bin | 1.0.0-1~bpo40+1 | etch-backports | amd64, i386
   wine-bin | 1.0.0-1~bpo40+1 | etch-backports | amd64, i386

lenny backports.org has no wine. 

Alex

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Conflict with lmms and BPO's wine (conflicting wine-bin)
  - From: Roy Berkeveld <roy@tnode.net>

Next by Date: Re: Conflict with lmms and BPO's wine (conflicting wine-bin)
Next by thread: Re: Conflict with lmms and BPO's wine (conflicting wine-bin)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread