[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Trying to backport valgrind to lenny



Le jeudi 27 mai 2010 17:38:01, Carsten Aulbert a écrit :
> Hi Alex (and Jordan)
> 
> On Thursday 27 May 2010 15:13:31 Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > ../../backport -l3.3.1 -c base.lenny.amd64 valgrind_3.5.0-3.dsc
> > > gpgv: keyblock resource `/root/scarsten/.gnupg/trustedkeys.gpg':
> > > general error gpgv: Signature made Tue Nov 17 17:03:13 2009 CET using
> > > DSA key ID B29396EB gpgv: Can't check signature: public key not found
> > > dpkg-source: warning: failed to verify signature on
> > > ./valgrind_3.5.0-3.dsc dpkg-source: info: extracting valgrind in
> > > valgrind-3.5.0
> > > dpkg-source: info: unpacking valgrind_3.5.0.orig.tar.gz
> > > dpkg-source: info: applying valgrind_3.5.0-3.diff.gz
> > > parsechangelog/debian: warning: 'since' option specifies non-existing
> > > version parsechangelog/debian: warning: use newest entry that is
> > > smaller than the one specified
> > > dch warning: new version (1:3.5.0-3~bpo50+1) is less than
> > > the current version number (1:3.5.0-3).
> > > Running pdebuild --buildresult .. --pbuilder cowbuilder --debbuildopts
> > > -d - v3.3.1 -- --basepath /var/cache/pbuilder/base.lenny.amd64.cow W:
> > > /root/scarsten/.pbuilderrc does not exist
> > > 
> > >   -> using cowbuilder as pbuilder
> > > 
> > > dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: autotools-dev dpatch (>>
> > > 2.0.0) gdb libc6-dev-i386 (>> 2.3.0)
> > > W: Unmet build-dependency in source
> > 
> > ^^^^^ HU? unmet build dependencys. The "script" should stop here.
> > 
> > > dpkg-buildpackage: warning: using a gain-root-command while being root
> > 
> > unfortunatly is doesn't. check your build dependencys.
> 
> I did (see rest of my original email), all build deps are available
> satisfying the version requirements.
You did show the result of apt-cache show but this doesn't prove it's 
installed. What's the result of dpkg -l | grep dpatch for example ?

Did you run apt-get build-dep valgrind ?
> 
> But you may be right, I'll try it by hand...
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Carsten

Cheers,

Thomas Preud'homme

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: