Re: Status of python-urljr and python-yadis
Hello,
* 2008-12-16 18:16, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> I wasn't/am not sure if you are subscribed to the bpo-users list, so I
> hope you don't mind the offlist copy.
In fact you are right, and I appreciate the off-list copy. :)
> If you could find out it would be nice. If there wasn't a
> reverse-dependency reason it might make sense to get them removed? At
> least aptitude doesn't show any reverse-dependencies for those?
Those were dependencies of python-openid, but it seems that the current
version doesn't need them anymore. It is safe to remove them from the
backports.
> Well, in fact there is no new version of qgis, the package was removed
> from lenny and unstable, my question roots in wether this backport could
> be considered outdated and thus should get removed because there isn't
> really support for it anymore.
I'd say that it is better to remove qgis from the backports too: the Debian
GIS team would need more resources to really support qgis packages.
Thanks,
--
Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it
Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it
_____________________________________________________________________
1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564
Reply to: