[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Useless PHP backports



On 10747 March 1977, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> I've noticed several "backports" where the package merely consists of a 
> couple of PHP scripts and the backport contains *no* difference besides 
> a changelog entry ("rebuild for sarge") and a changed version number.  
> Shouldn't there be a rule that a backport should at least contain a 
> functional difference to the version being backported from?  I know 
> that this doesn't do any harm, but it seems to be a waste of effort and 
> attention.

A backport should contain functional difference to the version in sarge,
thats what it is for. If there is something backported that doesnt do
this - flame the uploader and/or ask for its removal (mail here I guess).

-- 
bye Joerg
<GyrosGeier> SCSI benötigt drei Terminierungen, eine am einen Ende, eine
am anderen Ende, und das Leben einer Ziege über einer schwarzen Kerze

Attachment: pgpa7ALYrbmOJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: