Re: etch or later?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Thomas Walter wrote:
> So, what prevents recompiling this package with a newer version of gcj?
Nothing. That wasn't the problem. That bug is quite new. The problem is
*neon* blocking transition into testing currently (and a missing
powerpc build). Now, when subversion/perl are ready it will go in, but
OOo not - because it currently has conflicting build-deps (mozilla vs.
xulrunner which *will* be fixed, but not anymore for 2.0.2, but for the
next upload which will be 2.0.3rc5 or rc6) but because of that I can't
provide a powerpc package for 2.0.2-3 which is a prerequisite for
2.0.2-3 entering testing.
That RC bug (which is not really RC anyway after all can be ignored for
etch atm, that'd not a big problem)
Regards,
Rene
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFElYff+FmQsCSK63MRAnN4AKCEI7GjXXMwTqs+M994lF3KB2oU8wCeLOHk
2rzC+N6nYuRnI1zbwlz6XTI=
=lOze
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: