Re: etch or later?

To: backports-users@lists.backports.org
Subject: Re: etch or later?
From: Norbert Tretkowski <norbert@tretkowski.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 02:09:50 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060617000950.GC4750@kyllikki.home.inittab.de>
Mail-followup-to: backports-users@lists.backports.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060616201541.GB18481@localhost.localdomain>
References: <[🔎] 44906396.4040106@panthera-systems.net> <[🔎] 20060615222114.GA13764@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 20060615223329.GA9494@magellan.home.inittab.de> <[🔎] 20060616080734.GB16004@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 449295EF.7010101@panthera-systems.net> <[🔎] 20060616172330.GB18083@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 4492EE51.9070804@midnighthax.com> <[🔎] 20060616182019.GA18330@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 4492F798.1080304@cupis.co.uk> <[🔎] 20060616201541.GB18481@localhost.localdomain>

* Sylvain Beucler wrote:
[...]
> Bpo already lacks the auto-builders because it's separate from
> Debian itself

Wrong, backports.org uses Debians experimental buildds.

                Norbert

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Evince backport proposal
  - From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net>
- etch or sid? (Was: Evince backport proposal)
  - From: Sylvain Beucler <beuc@beuc.net>
- Re: etch or sid? (Was: Evince backport proposal)
  - From: Norbert Tretkowski <norbert@tretkowski.de>
- Re: etch or sid? (Was: Evince backport proposal)
  - From: Sylvain Beucler <beuc@beuc.net>
- Re: etch or sid? (Was: Evince backport proposal)
  - From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net>
- Re: etch or later?
  - From: Sylvain Beucler <beuc@beuc.net>
- Re: etch or later?
  - From: Keith Edmunds <keith@midnighthax.com>
- Re: etch or later?
  - From: Sylvain Beucler <beuc@beuc.net>
- Re: etch or later?
  - From: Paul Cupis <paul@cupis.co.uk>
- Re: etch or later?
  - From: Sylvain Beucler <beuc@beuc.net>

Prev by Date: Re: etch or later?
Next by Date: Re: etch or later?
Previous by thread: Re: etch or later?
Next by thread: Re: etch or later?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread