Re: libpoppler backport

[Zsolt Rizsanyi <rizsanyi@users.sourceforge.net>]

On Monday 03 April 2006 14:24, Frank Küster wrote:
> the backport of libpoppler creates a binary package libpoppler0c2.  IIRC
> the c2 suffix means that the package has been linked against the new
> libstdc++ which is ABI-incompatible to sarge's.  Shouldn't the packages
> be renamed to libpoppler0, libpoppler0-glib etc.?

Since there weren't any poppler packages in Sarge I think it is quite 
unimportant how they are called.
Leaving off the c2 suffix might be nice, but it would just complicate the 
backporting without any real gain.

Regards,
Zsolt