Re: "Backports" of Arch: all packages welcome?
Joerg Jaspert <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 10571 March 1977, Frank Küster wrote:
>> The particular example why I'm asking is auctex - you can't build it on
>> a clean sarge system, but you can install the etch version on sarge
>> without problems. Should I upload it to backports.org?
> No, bpo is autobuild and it needs to be able to build in sarge + bpo only!
auctex can be built in sarge + bpo (just not in pure sarge), and if
other packages are needed in the future, we could add these to bpo.
The real question is whether such arch: all packages should be included
in bpo at all.
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)