[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted emacs 1:29.4+1-2~bpo12+1 (source) into stable-backports



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:34:26 +0900
Source: emacs
Architecture: source
Version: 1:29.4+1-2~bpo12+1
Distribution: bookworm-backports
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
Changed-By: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
Closes: 1074137
Changes:
 emacs (1:29.4+1-2~bpo12+1) bookworm-backports; urgency=high
 .
   * Rebuild for bookworm-backports.
     - Fixes CVE-2024-39331.
 .
 emacs (1:29.4+1-3) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Mark dired-test-bug27243-02 as unstable for now.
     This appears to be a known issue:
       https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27243#64
       https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27243#115
     Add 0017-Mark-dired-test-bug27243-02-as-unstable-for-now.patch to
     address it.
 .
 emacs (1:29.4+1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Minor edits to README.source.
   * Merge divergent branches of development.
     These were accidentally introduced by the previous upload.
 .
 emacs (1:29.4+1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Merge upstream version 29.4. (Closes: 1074137)
   * Update debian/copyright for 29.4.
Checksums-Sha1:
 4162dffa67064f1d706c10e27291a8f91eec8db6 3143 emacs_29.4+1-2~bpo12+1.dsc
 ee20da23f3289ff86ea50d6b4918274cc7447a49 66900 emacs_29.4+1-2~bpo12+1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 f3da277d92a0be4856ec2b14e55d3b51b65198f39f87d3ea9702b2c2a1fac05e 3143 emacs_29.4+1-2~bpo12+1.dsc
 60d30f6492f451dddaa7de8309006e3bf312cf7f5471ca84c724e4187763126c 66900 emacs_29.4+1-2~bpo12+1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 80358965afb74e1138631800542483c6 3143 editors optional emacs_29.4+1-2~bpo12+1.dsc
 ce5e29b83d1b54fdcf3f9f8b69d8f6ed 66900 editors optional emacs_29.4+1-2~bpo12+1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=0rS9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpzMzLopfeCU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: