Accepted open-vm-tools 2:12.2.0-1+deb12u2~bpo10+1 (source) into oldoldstable-backports-sloppy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 14:53:48 +0100
Source: open-vm-tools
Architecture: source
Version: 2:12.2.0-1+deb12u2~bpo10+1
Distribution: buster-backports-sloppy
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Bernd Zeimetz <bzed@debian.org>
Changed-By: Bernd Zeimetz <bzed@debian.org>
Changes:
open-vm-tools (2:12.2.0-1+deb12u2~bpo10+1) buster-backports-sloppy; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for buster-backports.
* [d01f552] Updating gbp.conf for buster-backports.
* [5adfc551] No -Wno-error=address-of-packed-member in CFLAGS
* [8d38a239] Revert "build-depend on libgdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0-dev"
* [1957baa1] Revert "d/rules, d/control: switch to use fuse3"
* Don't build containerinfo package - build-deps missing
Checksums-Sha1:
16aa82818cd3812ff39ef722ee01412fe4ec5e28 2595 open-vm-tools_12.2.0-1+deb12u2~bpo10+1.dsc
90bd141ebc5a58f3e6c3ac334f69296762cb628c 39652 open-vm-tools_12.2.0-1+deb12u2~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
a5ff7cfb66e5c14c2bda89b268be56e5601ee3b2 5565 open-vm-tools_12.2.0-1+deb12u2~bpo10+1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
64aefce1132af10bf691a7d82261eefcdefbb43c775443d029179dee4e357439 2595 open-vm-tools_12.2.0-1+deb12u2~bpo10+1.dsc
e2d84d5f489e25c5ce9bf4ea849052f5a74d70a7c5442073405c74ca8847d38e 39652 open-vm-tools_12.2.0-1+deb12u2~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
11778a21b8c62196535e6ee19f2c3e295749dd090eb16cf374571b1b4c57ef67 5565 open-vm-tools_12.2.0-1+deb12u2~bpo10+1_source.buildinfo
Files:
22e8984f6eb9ba5862e58abff8badb21 2595 admin optional open-vm-tools_12.2.0-1+deb12u2~bpo10+1.dsc
1cc2aafbbb0c7a766e3eead9e8d320a6 39652 admin optional open-vm-tools_12.2.0-1+deb12u2~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
db3be2f14ef6989d4044f1a361e47601 5565 admin optional open-vm-tools_12.2.0-1+deb12u2~bpo10+1_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=iIi5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: