Accepted qemu 1:7.1+dfsg-2~bpo11+2 (source) into bullseye-backports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 12:27:24 +0300
Source: qemu
Architecture: source
Version: 1:7.1+dfsg-2~bpo11+2
Distribution: bullseye-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QEMU Team <pkg-qemu-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Changes:
qemu (1:7.1+dfsg-2~bpo11+2) bullseye-backports; urgency=medium
.
* Revert "temporary workaround for gcc-12 bug #1019011:
use gcc-11-alpha-linux-gnu instead of gcc-alpha-linux-gnu"
On bullseye there's no gcc-11, and gcc-10 compiles everything
just fine.
Checksums-Sha1:
8eb246040af96feb2ff2a67aa32f8e9bbc23c95d 6485 qemu_7.1+dfsg-2~bpo11+2.dsc
12b3b176380251147d7fdbdffdb07921fc9fabfa 103540 qemu_7.1+dfsg-2~bpo11+2.debian.tar.xz
1fc3732653fc4eed8d3f84d93aab62d1f339722a 13646 qemu_7.1+dfsg-2~bpo11+2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
9512ad405d70b5a05c50d5c59e604fcc3adcba39feed5de9efa84eadcc50a76e 6485 qemu_7.1+dfsg-2~bpo11+2.dsc
a1d049b4a359f2213fb21680be828a0b9b97abdf2ba8857f04c0d058e3a71699 103540 qemu_7.1+dfsg-2~bpo11+2.debian.tar.xz
20cb2bb2ab350f67fc106527bb8d6945a70caedfea4c827aed2c0991eee3d998 13646 qemu_7.1+dfsg-2~bpo11+2_source.buildinfo
Files:
07b77a6456b9a5b739fe026f7a7ada01 6485 otherosfs optional qemu_7.1+dfsg-2~bpo11+2.dsc
f0bf7f12b5b3d59835afecd20cd31ef9 103540 otherosfs optional qemu_7.1+dfsg-2~bpo11+2.debian.tar.xz
a474e51bc14c622cd2742eb8c1f2724b 13646 otherosfs optional qemu_7.1+dfsg-2~bpo11+2_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQFDBAEBCAAtFiEEe3O61ovnosKJMUsicBtPaxppPlkFAmMuzaYPHG1qdEB0bHMu
bXNrLnJ1AAoJEHAbT2saaT5ZG6UIAL0PMybRgtJ5ho6K8iVkuAsxhN+sGJB1sXnK
rb6dZRd2VpAsTPRCF7UwHvqtjTfEGKyMBmqseD+SSmLiwjPDrXmYMPxiEyBt9KOI
aE6c6DjF2d1szelrMy/EpHQNNf9lypDQzuSScUtdkS7Mv0XeO4DogC2M54Z7po0p
hydUHclBt/2/T7GPLtj3d6uFjErEPtncWn+Z7oZPnNHQjR64iuw012JqGaeXCfx6
29x2YvZCm2HXTLgNkRzlVeex7drXCzfY1jZTKe9455MyjTRdymVyehzsAuaPttfC
fifthztE3y/Gn/f0AXexx7sjPioaJK1kfzxj6M85hm32iUayn0I=
=t/Xl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: