[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted qmapshack 1.16.1-1~bpo11+1 (source) into bullseye-backports



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 08:22:08 +0100
Source: qmapshack
Architecture: source
Version: 1.16.1-1~bpo11+1
Distribution: bullseye-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GIS Project <pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@debian.org>
Changes:
 qmapshack (1.16.1-1~bpo11+1) bullseye-backports; urgency=medium
 .
   * Rebuild for bullseye-backports.
 .
 qmapshack (1.16.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.0, no changes.
   * Bump debhelper compat to 12, changes:
     - Drop --list-missing from dh_install
   * Add pkg-config to build dependencies.
   * Refresh patches.
   * Update lintian overrides.
 .
 qmapshack (1.16.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Update proj.patch with proj.h support.
Checksums-Sha1:
 bfa2e84b5251ece3cfc57eb7a9486d42dba7d78b 2265 qmapshack_1.16.1-1~bpo11+1.dsc
 e105477397b6f73901381afd6697e6ef1dd7bcbb 10688 qmapshack_1.16.1-1~bpo11+1.debian.tar.xz
 ba98e71a1683e517acc8a838ab310fc6bfbef200 18652 qmapshack_1.16.1-1~bpo11+1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 f3f2e1d95c802b4ed4339bf0404b075b40efebe68d5dfd94d74b71b7541fe8e5 2265 qmapshack_1.16.1-1~bpo11+1.dsc
 68f202e9489fe47f861960bd702520d2311399143fd5fd4515e66f8f39d3a7be 10688 qmapshack_1.16.1-1~bpo11+1.debian.tar.xz
 626b399ed8467e4c8453f89e129dd776929c5903044d7aa3aefbd3affcafa363 18652 qmapshack_1.16.1-1~bpo11+1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 62ba30931ce3ca2947ec620fa35175a0 2265 science optional qmapshack_1.16.1-1~bpo11+1.dsc
 3008398d05aca6691d66d819b376255d 10688 science optional qmapshack_1.16.1-1~bpo11+1.debian.tar.xz
 5dde99db9b348b193178faa06898f5ee 18652 science optional qmapshack_1.16.1-1~bpo11+1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=2NIO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: