Accepted lintian 2.99.0~bpo10+1 (source) into buster-backports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:09:44 +0000
Source: lintian
Architecture: source
Version: 2.99.0~bpo10+1
Distribution: buster-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers <lintian-maint@debian.org>
Changed-By: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Closes: 972464
Changes:
lintian (2.99.0~bpo10+1) buster-backports; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for buster-backports.
.
lintian (2.99.0) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Chris Lamb ]
* Update the declares-possibly-conflicting-debhelper-compat-versions tag
as we could be specifying the level in debian/rules or debian/control.
(Closes: #972464)
.
[ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ]
* Bump severity of the script-uses-unversioned-python-in-shebang tag and
reword the warning message.
.
[ Felix Lechner ]
* Fix prefix detection for single orig tarball components that only have
one directory component.
.
[ Paul Wise ]
* Add several spelling corrections and sort the dictionary.
Checksums-Sha1:
e117296a236163ae60e6cb8a4ec06e01b3d3b728 2390 lintian_2.99.0~bpo10+1.dsc
6c94befddbe88106cc558eae273233fd665ebaf2 1997692 lintian_2.99.0~bpo10+1.tar.xz
e73d09aa28230a0181cbc2bce68650d6dd730847 5901 lintian_2.99.0~bpo10+1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
4cb5b8d43b05746cbcc168fe7bd89010dc1efbc0242d46b843c8f1bfdae044b1 2390 lintian_2.99.0~bpo10+1.dsc
a28772af02e63cf86726bc526533b485c2bd26d34bb9ce8f91fa0a8d8b081d64 1997692 lintian_2.99.0~bpo10+1.tar.xz
5f0c3afb9e57a09d24cba131704b8bd2d448a7cce8dfc6b0a84f9b3687f1cc5f 5901 lintian_2.99.0~bpo10+1_source.buildinfo
Files:
cce1e0fef16c0f9f48d7858761361948 2390 devel optional lintian_2.99.0~bpo10+1.dsc
b36cb4da5c8281ca68bcec348a6de81d 1997692 devel optional lintian_2.99.0~bpo10+1.tar.xz
bc9767c072abde9185d2b65a2b5cab85 5901 devel optional lintian_2.99.0~bpo10+1_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=XfQg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: