[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted musescore-general-soundfont 0.2-2~bpo10+1 (source) into buster-backports



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA384

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 17:49:05 +0200
Source: musescore-general-soundfont
Architecture: source
Version: 0.2-2~bpo10+1
Distribution: buster-backports
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
Changed-By: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
Changes:
 musescore-general-soundfont (0.2-2~bpo10+1) buster-backports; urgency=high
 .
   * Rebuild for buster-backports.
   * Remaining changes against testing:
     - Adjust VCS-* headers
     - Restore pre-buster upgrade maintainer script
 .
 musescore-general-soundfont (0.2-2) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Merge musescore-general-soundfont-small (0.2-2) changes
 .
 musescore-general-soundfont-small (0.2-2) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * The INAM chunk m̲u̲s̲t̲ contain the string “MuseScore_General”
     (MuseScore checks this as case-sensitive substring)
     so expressive patches work
Checksums-Sha1:
 006af6d77cf9cb0155eabd75f1ca4b10f811f058 2358 musescore-general-soundfont_0.2-2~bpo10+1.dsc
 a337c2052b32f6e0c7995e814d3a2bc89f9b660b 11360 musescore-general-soundfont_0.2-2~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 44111ae06d5ea0b3bdaf95077b7abeccce830e77c837809d499178d11e430914 2358 musescore-general-soundfont_0.2-2~bpo10+1.dsc
 a04a75c03834144d2c00bbb52fe732af0dfa10b32c4953b086ee16f64b3c25f7 11360 musescore-general-soundfont_0.2-2~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 dcef0ac29faaf3d448138c3e0d709849 2358 sound optional musescore-general-soundfont_0.2-2~bpo10+1.dsc
 0ab6e71c1c009378370a6f26aa920e9d 11360 sound optional musescore-general-soundfont_0.2-2~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (MirBSD)
Comment: ☃ ЦΤℱ—8 ☕☂☄
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=8kVY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: