Accepted dh-elpa 2.0.4~bpo10+1 (source) into buster-backports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 15:18:37 -0700
Source: dh-elpa
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.4~bpo10+1
Distribution: buster-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Emacsen team <debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
Closes: 941330
Changes:
dh-elpa (2.0.4~bpo10+1) buster-backports; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for buster-backports.
.
dh-elpa (2.0.4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ David Bremner ]
* Enable Multi-Arch: foreign. Currently it seems like any
architecture-dependent variance in the behaviour of dh_elpa is
probably a bug.
.
dh-elpa (2.0.3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Nicholas D Steeves ]
* Fix typos in dh_elpa documentation.
* Clean up trailing whitespace in this changelog.
.
[ Sean Whitton ]
* dh_elpa_test(1): Note exit code requirement in docs for ert_helper
(Closes: #941330).
.
[ Daniel Kahn Gillmor ]
* Use secure copyright file specification URI.
* Update standards version to 4.4.1, no changes needed.
* Bump debhelper from old 10 to 12.
* Set debhelper-compat version in Build-Depends.
* Rules-Requires-Root: no
Checksums-Sha1:
c959643e54cf7a660733b33048a39c146e235501 1868 dh-elpa_2.0.4~bpo10+1.dsc
6ed2b1f0a0c7c0711b38233e901cc12645a303dd 22672 dh-elpa_2.0.4~bpo10+1.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
cf701eeec1ae9082770b7228e68367f4098435c2188e49d66c08d6dbe6075838 1868 dh-elpa_2.0.4~bpo10+1.dsc
48089dca0a0ed3b057a4272af7b687ec3af0cfc2e468d27523eba879f291ca1d 22672 dh-elpa_2.0.4~bpo10+1.tar.xz
Files:
e1f623e6c1c61ea7a4cb96bb9723852d 1868 devel optional dh-elpa_2.0.4~bpo10+1.dsc
cca9165fdfeaf807fef6004f6d27376c 22672 devel optional dh-elpa_2.0.4~bpo10+1.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEm5FwB64DDjbk/CSLaVt65L8GYkAFAl7daC8ACgkQaVt65L8G
YkDSqw/+OMU6j5gN2vRpKFk8RXtG9vrs2dJKRkEMZzo9M2MBE0ngebX2LeMHJ4D0
UXKcV7KCAzn334g8NZ7/I1B2dzojEXW6VAsRixaPgBsnRDKjDT2JTpJFeLfNrCDD
Xo5T8PfEKAXpM5G1W7FgHpuwv/foXyKyD0F7LIxCOoD1IAXVQBUNDxYjQua3B7t9
ia8NOkZ0E39qKOTX+OIxGO0wH+uyhDjmEcRCIArOHxvUFNaUxU49+G0yrY5Dw9Nu
2EasYwawtbErYCSqD74W9da4klDIB60RbYC87h1cifRJwqGTtJQHvL8faGxGe37/
zy/Vz+H/pgWAtqGEQlU/aMMa1p+TdG/m+ajVLrWx+FsQBxIuATTt4jN4QxGiN8CG
ZULwlUp6P+SigLieAEq6qLKIFUTarqiESI7WLKH7LBJXRj8/gon0RnM4/bxAUaH5
25bTiSR1D/4zOSy7EvJVDamr8d4YTIVav6oCRX+KcYKG0kVAjIobnNMPn0wdcmDg
36EXXrLngAjkop7oOp5N/POwrTpW1/fFvHIbaN3SgFBnT1IF9SlOINc9uxG4E/us
uJuTF7Pcfvrh1+SaHu95kbl0YTX39JEZ8JhtpkzcU/WaDrj0x3d+t0IL8yeSeRAZ
YtDvzH+ch4D0rwBMFgJLWl9ZjB9+ecgw+zg2nmYWd8x7xyTFb+g=
=T1Fn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: