Accepted lintian 2.75.0~bpo10+1 (source all) into buster-backports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 09:59:56 +0100
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Built-For-Profiles: nocheck
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.75.0~bpo10+1
Distribution: buster-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers <lintian-maint@debian.org>
Changed-By: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Description:
lintian - Debian package checker
Closes: 960970
Changes:
lintian (2.75.0~bpo10+1) buster-backports; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for buster-backports.
.
lintian (2.75.0) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Chris Lamb ]
* Clarify the error messge when the file specified to check does not
exist. (Closes: #960970)
.
[ Felix Lechner ]
* Strip comments in debian/rules correctly.
Checksums-Sha1:
b62e201b45c3c51a3be096328aa8dbba28e83704 4163 lintian_2.75.0~bpo10+1.dsc
248056d9ec19d5668a5ca4e6b94a9993f55dc78b 1933612 lintian_2.75.0~bpo10+1.tar.xz
a1a9b18330d5d2cb5787ca820735b816e8110ad1 1291152 lintian_2.75.0~bpo10+1_all.deb
bc79a780263c5d646481510e8f1164efe0fb8e2c 6108 lintian_2.75.0~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
74940e2bb2c4330c34d58819b91edb01bacbb02fdd99bb392bd6c67e2c0209ab 4163 lintian_2.75.0~bpo10+1.dsc
3ad7365254d551ed580796f1c1a96a7d3026d7bcdd45f560b916e3569636d497 1933612 lintian_2.75.0~bpo10+1.tar.xz
72e619d0fac47906de6d56f5d81b8e2d3cee9f83b3a87f0c4448fe193eba9bc6 1291152 lintian_2.75.0~bpo10+1_all.deb
e6a9ef4d63f18ebf1576f79bad96e63028a83512d801b58a48921e5951513082 6108 lintian_2.75.0~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
dd972d77ba0e5c67fc3b954857382a48 4163 devel optional lintian_2.75.0~bpo10+1.dsc
4c5fa2947a2ac90b2a3927370c338e79 1933612 devel optional lintian_2.75.0~bpo10+1.tar.xz
3ec38c3a6ec81d09d70e5769f11b56c4 1291152 devel optional lintian_2.75.0~bpo10+1_all.deb
9618cdf442cea353338324de9b4285d8 6108 devel optional lintian_2.75.0~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=1EY+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: