[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted znc 1.7.5-4~bpo10+1 (source) into buster-backports



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 23:19:16 +0200
Source: znc
Architecture: source
Version: 1.7.5-4~bpo10+1
Distribution: buster-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Patrick Matthäi <pmatthaei@debian.org>
Changed-By: Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org>
Closes: 950571 952602
Changes:
 znc (1.7.5-4~bpo10+1) buster-backports; urgency=medium
 .
   * Rebuild for buster-backports.
 .
 znc (1.7.5-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Add oidentd configuration example and explain it in README.Debian.
     Closes: #950571
 .
 znc (1.7.5-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Build-depend on the unversioned swig.  Closes: #952602
 .
 znc (1.7.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.5.0.
   * Adjust source lintian-overrides.
   * Override false positive lintian warnings.
   * Remove Cflags and Libs section from pkgconfig file.
Checksums-Sha1:
 98b2d38aa48d0a9f0361e20242ee535c7697e637 2454 znc_1.7.5-4~bpo10+1.dsc
 8a15ec60b69b4beece0b79fd99fc71640d5331a1 511388 znc_1.7.5-4~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
 d954805654fa700c315de6f89568286c8d19f40a 17160 znc_1.7.5-4~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 b3be537b75967eb2c4801d32e50f744e082dddaaafb5470670ee30ec0568b492 2454 znc_1.7.5-4~bpo10+1.dsc
 114fa91fbad7f7bbbff606498f0ae5cac7ec9b19de35498aa5d3519cafd2530c 511388 znc_1.7.5-4~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
 51108ae821d3e45b621330545768ddc5bf306c8f942f9d373e120369b200a796 17160 znc_1.7.5-4~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 52baeda020b59bc086869516914ea98e 2454 net optional znc_1.7.5-4~bpo10+1.dsc
 d6a34341e15aec5abdbc39e05e6d5400 511388 net optional znc_1.7.5-4~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
 45a6c949325f686b078065676957c44d 17160 net optional znc_1.7.5-4~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=v/0D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: