Accepted jmapviewer 2.13+dfsg-1~bpo10+1 (source) into buster-backports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 08:06:01 +0100
Source: jmapviewer
Architecture: source
Version: 2.13+dfsg-1~bpo10+1
Distribution: buster-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GIS Project <pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@debian.org>
Changes:
jmapviewer (2.13+dfsg-1~bpo10+1) buster-backports; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for buster-backports.
.
jmapviewer (2.13+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release.
* Drop Name field from upstream metadata.
* Bump Standards-Version to 4.5.0, no changes.
* Update copyright years for Vincent Privat.
Checksums-Sha1:
3ab20c950820ffd2729aaeb76af6fbb270dc84f1 2197 jmapviewer_2.13+dfsg-1~bpo10+1.dsc
df06289d8764e96b78a76e3bd7509085e38eb88d 7996 jmapviewer_2.13+dfsg-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
a75823936bf7e48cd5d1b08987b68f68759c4528 8714 jmapviewer_2.13+dfsg-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
ef61d0488be1df4fad3ad42e520be44f83847c191e96bb0377e72f1592362d48 2197 jmapviewer_2.13+dfsg-1~bpo10+1.dsc
fb2854741980e32c734b31c396ad1fbb01075900e764431e8794a926611f79c9 7996 jmapviewer_2.13+dfsg-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
4201c839cd75ec7daf767b75506a01edb56357f3241bd6cf4f3ea2d0032a382f 8714 jmapviewer_2.13+dfsg-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
751206ae4d3eb17082f54507d0fb3c10 2197 utils optional jmapviewer_2.13+dfsg-1~bpo10+1.dsc
5e04926a6f90aaf72ee038debb95d7a7 7996 utils optional jmapviewer_2.13+dfsg-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
442c5eed2439ed108aa0c8032d98b642 8714 utils optional jmapviewer_2.13+dfsg-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEgYLeQXBWQI1hRlDRZ1DxCuiNSvEFAl5Q2GMACgkQZ1DxCuiN
SvF6CQ/+O06b+2h+la9gDp9AcXtwyA/u6PL6/KtiLggxY6jV6ReM5Yw5CsCY2ocD
BDW7TYDA1LtI8VQi1k1KMky5u18UQQoNk8wKPROOf5PgR0e23PI+SsOxvRSsbfSt
kSQLSEtpVq/vC6I4lhCwouvPbbFPDDu2ta6ax5nk+GdUhFTaIIVICoNXZorrR2Wh
NAvbqZz2QZTILqPKPimzsfXgMHm5dSAu347TX94+2vBgca+GhvA5pa2PCgWTQ4gi
qr6vgd16lTRF+MC1bHmw9kvP+Y3Iqw4IEwl5zMNSQw8cvTnRIwQ29KuaO95n+dCp
JGBeUeGyapKW6Y+KhMk2ZvlKjasCL+93cf0LtWMBpnX8TIW94jIzKdeks3OHlYaF
ff8VaE9UOrjqWhgVvmZkSPEeYRcT61pyUKPNreb6vjVT1siOhiQJFeYz790rkYFm
LU8XTSNSGuS8YiVwnu8dkB/z6uCCo9T8tM9Fx8cARVxXW9OZz0LuCsM5U2Cg1WD7
G8/9FZxXH8TJbe4h8hCTny7Iun8Su0vDPTcRZkFlbUprh2BjCWqMqeHpkS3FIXYw
qIXAAmsPedqzuaZzoEqaOYzUh1y4B/TvcJKc5Fp1E5PfqmLPPgHKYXcYwBRikVd+
XEqPM7cvh1ZTIKaC0he8zphifGyLGnVBaE3YWUh2C8Y/SQ+e12g=
=mIjO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: