Accepted lintian 2.36.0~bpo10+1 (source all) into buster-backports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 17:50:16 -0500
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Built-For-Profiles: nocheck
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.36.0~bpo10+1
Distribution: buster-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers <lintian-maint@debian.org>
Changed-By: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Description:
lintian - Debian package checker
Closes: 944145
Changes:
lintian (2.36.0~bpo10+1) buster-backports; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for buster-backports.
.
lintian (2.36.0) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Don't emit systemd-service-file-missing-install-key for .service files
with corresponding .path or .timer pairs. (Closes: #944145)
Checksums-Sha1:
d9429397b0630e0e66cdc0872f2679315390f605 4102 lintian_2.36.0~bpo10+1.dsc
4bfc95ff574b9d0072fe42dde7b730913c555636 1805528 lintian_2.36.0~bpo10+1.tar.xz
ae0ca7c16fba8239a45faf96358c77f1b160f7c1 1293600 lintian_2.36.0~bpo10+1_all.deb
1cc7d4edb792b6e52a5f6fc1189467eea4430925 6010 lintian_2.36.0~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
17628f2b858be4aeb89e6d58d5b3e5bdafac394c7ae0a0c075703cc6151a89c9 4102 lintian_2.36.0~bpo10+1.dsc
3368969ae2bbc7e57f5de6d8d23d80d37d70b6acf97e39252b2af8882cbdb81a 1805528 lintian_2.36.0~bpo10+1.tar.xz
af05bb09dff0b5d15ada56a8a03703835c39329b7bcd2f3d09f9b4d35b641edf 1293600 lintian_2.36.0~bpo10+1_all.deb
f51feb366d919d47dc4e7927d6dca26ea588cda9f603887a19c54db19d4ab491 6010 lintian_2.36.0~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
a2f39094a457de722024991f94c59d98 4102 devel optional lintian_2.36.0~bpo10+1.dsc
b2af1d9161ca16f40f140fcb7d5c255b 1805528 devel optional lintian_2.36.0~bpo10+1.tar.xz
8c43eeaaaec7193d0fcdcc60001b3bd4 1293600 devel optional lintian_2.36.0~bpo10+1_all.deb
06bb82769b8cdaa0725ef5bca964f01c 6010 devel optional lintian_2.36.0~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=h+Ue
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: