[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted exfat-utils 1.2.5-2~bpo8+1 (source amd64) into jessie-backports



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 14:37:42 -0500
Source: exfat-utils
Binary: exfat-utils
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.2.5-2~bpo8+1
Distribution: jessie-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Sven Hoexter <hoexter@debian.org>
Changed-By: Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com>
Description:
 exfat-utils - utilities to create, check, label and dump exFAT filesystem
Closes: 851922
Changes:
 exfat-utils (1.2.5-2~bpo8+1) jessie-backports; urgency=medium
 .
   * Rebuild for jessie-backports.
 .
 exfat-utils (1.2.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Move from autotools-dev to dh-autoreconf to ease backporting.
     Patch provided by Nicholas D Steeves. (Closes: #851922)
 .
 exfat-utils (1.2.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release.
Checksums-Sha1:
 997aad1f287e9c64de0c67b6014c97e467b6567b 1920 exfat-utils_1.2.5-2~bpo8+1.dsc
 819365bb5f1a6e2d7cc606b999506c021d3b86b0 3372 exfat-utils_1.2.5-2~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
 b8cc60d98d6b6e039b310eb25795ec33fa6c1ce8 44458 exfat-utils_1.2.5-2~bpo8+1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 5b029bd0507307d4dc5d0298c639d4cfb8a59f5bd2020c1e727b82afc4302a80 1920 exfat-utils_1.2.5-2~bpo8+1.dsc
 ffaea218a2488138d078c0c8306d0fcf930ef2125bbe2b661b8235f009246dc5 3372 exfat-utils_1.2.5-2~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
 b5c7ee68cdae260b74063b929c3eb1c06fae1154f6a34ad7f46d15149999a1f1 44458 exfat-utils_1.2.5-2~bpo8+1_amd64.deb
Files:
 4df24ddb4d09614f09a3ea0b4c0962b2 1920 otherosfs optional exfat-utils_1.2.5-2~bpo8+1.dsc
 36c7d56104867194858b83a87179f70c 3372 otherosfs optional exfat-utils_1.2.5-2~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
 4d73fcf2f334586d22864928b94e5f50 44458 otherosfs optional exfat-utils_1.2.5-2~bpo8+1_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=uJEg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: