Accepted firejail 0.9.42-1~bpo8+1 (source) into jessie-backports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 20:52:30 +0200
Source: firejail
Binary: firejail
Architecture: source
Version: 0.9.42-1~bpo8+1
Distribution: jessie-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Reiner Herrmann <reiner@reiner-h.de>
Changed-By: Reiner Herrmann <reiner@reiner-h.de>
Description:
firejail - sandbox to restrict the application environment
Closes: 834256
Changes:
firejail (0.9.42-1~bpo8+1) jessie-backports; urgency=low
.
* Rebuild for jessie-backports.
.
firejail (0.9.42-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release.
.
firejail (0.9.42~rc2-1) experimental; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release candidate.
- shell prompt no longer overwritten by default (Closes: #834256)
* Drop patch for build failure, applied upstream.
* Add upstream signing key.
* Check upstream signature with uscan.
* Install upstream README.
* Enable AppArmor support.
* Include upstream sysutils tests in autopkgtest run.
.
firejail (0.9.42~rc1-2) experimental; urgency=low
.
* Cherry-pick upstream fix for build failure on non-x86 platforms.
.
firejail (0.9.42~rc1-1) experimental; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release candidate.
* Drop LXC patch applied upstream.
* Add ping and wget to test dependencies.
* Run autopkgtests in isolation-machine.
Checksums-Sha1:
e91a9b2868351c383d308e3fa48de77f02132c17 2350 firejail_0.9.42-1~bpo8+1.dsc
10b0e1b87cd4346781760a4cded82e5b2b493807 5748 firejail_0.9.42-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
ed53ceb61e505190cf57e66e1c485cf9b215573fe913e715697e1da77e46f879 2350 firejail_0.9.42-1~bpo8+1.dsc
d144b54b22ec78ad0aaf29869ce3444152b5034a22feca1557705cbd29c41f46 5748 firejail_0.9.42-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
897f2b21ea76547f4af188e74b2c445e 2350 utils optional firejail_0.9.42-1~bpo8+1.dsc
a2b57b4953f5f1253bacb01006696825 5748 utils optional firejail_0.9.42-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=ml3p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: