[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted mkgmap-splitter 0.0.0+svn439-1~bpo8+1 (source all) into jessie-backports



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 09:42:07 +0200
Source: mkgmap-splitter
Binary: mkgmap-splitter
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.0.0+svn439-1~bpo8+1
Distribution: jessie-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GIS Project <pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@debian.org>
Description:
 mkgmap-splitter - Tile splitter for mkgmap
Changes:
 mkgmap-splitter (0.0.0+svn439-1~bpo8+1) jessie-backports; urgency=medium
 .
   * Rebuild for jessie-backports.
 .
 mkgmap-splitter (0.0.0+svn439-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream SVN snapshot.
   * Include epoch in default-jdk-headless version requirement.
Checksums-Sha1:
 c7867ff3dc4171158f2e85804464947908a629ad 2320 mkgmap-splitter_0.0.0+svn439-1~bpo8+1.dsc
 4fd8c3cee02aa3c737f5c0435cdc36e6afd6be8d 11616 mkgmap-splitter_0.0.0+svn439-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
 e880813b2bd574e2ca32eae3b394c9ebc8b803dd 388654 mkgmap-splitter_0.0.0+svn439-1~bpo8+1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 b755914bfd4f1918d1920470422a5804aa3167fdf08ae849ed3fdf49f982717d 2320 mkgmap-splitter_0.0.0+svn439-1~bpo8+1.dsc
 0f277c4acb6b6407dd3f2b6d544ab47527424e2a16d28e2fd00d1daa19cd989e 11616 mkgmap-splitter_0.0.0+svn439-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
 ab6cb2cc0d743961369289dd9eceeedaf4cd9dea2e6e1a8e81bade3420f9cbf2 388654 mkgmap-splitter_0.0.0+svn439-1~bpo8+1_all.deb
Files:
 fac5c8221237211a00eab20af1a9c53a 2320 utils optional mkgmap-splitter_0.0.0+svn439-1~bpo8+1.dsc
 dea893709ca2315fc0bbe74e783f813f 11616 utils optional mkgmap-splitter_0.0.0+svn439-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
 c5b9f9f23868238b1ae07c59396fd531 388654 utils optional mkgmap-splitter_0.0.0+svn439-1~bpo8+1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXz8d5AAoJEGdQ8QrojUrxx8YP/2Fc+HBXXtz9ChHT7p0wD76R
WG8Yps4KJDhUOXAGzT39rAUMKKeJ1Hl3cJv/STI73RyQPqIqYws/d7PgOaZhPJ71
1zJH0J+oIVYdQmk3/LRXkGOIdC6x7Xfa7/xlgfhDCIL0kR40sTIUL1QJRS5m9d5t
/rvzBv6C8RxgGVUCh0zpCUTuSCxpP6E1hqS47RDQnr9Klsp11hkVtDri5bfI5UTg
JYTXyzCPJlNKsyfRpBKK/r8YCw82NepzdyzvfTo2EGsZ5P3qc7q14Vw0REYUm6k+
Xkz7IRTWwsCsBS+c9WK1L0cW7xNaXzR65nmvmPhM2PpF7CJFEGX4bI3cF1FI3XkM
8vukelArawJeapiS/ZFh7437Dxn0gRCwbNMC4e1/7WbJz4xCAGiTs2SqR1fsuWqU
p9S2NO8RXtzQWZPZWNetaq95FFZPhvrVggGpC+VywUTuDTQF1fdSEva7PqnGJFEx
tekYxmvIAPUxVE0D728pWxq2n7IbN/P7wPkcQMqMRllPdzhetPbqjFu9KUHdpDex
CtpaOQgoIpSrvll2KU7ammmF/TNLLXQP43AhQPBptiOwRaqZ0Qs0EhllLSDTALV6
67JUNuDrJV8kS6INLbiz3r3Ofqt/ZPZcTlNzN4AHrjCSuzwLIJwAWDnSMWe3uj2z
OYiKxwKsmUfu4C8wmFZE
=8pUy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: