Accepted tmux 2.2-1~bpo8+1 (amd64 source) into jessie-backports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 18:06:14 +0200
Source: tmux
Binary: tmux
Architecture: amd64 source
Version: 2.2-1~bpo8+1
Distribution: jessie-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Romain Francoise <rfrancoise@debian.org>
Changed-By: Romain Francoise <rfrancoise@debian.org>
Closes: 644366 648867
Description:
tmux - terminal multiplexer
Changes:
tmux (2.2-1~bpo8+1) jessie-backports; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for jessie-backports.
.
tmux (2.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release.
.
tmux (2.2~git20160406-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream snapshot, from Git commit ad2532c3f4.
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.7.
.
tmux (2.2~git20160306-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream snapshot, from Git commit 5fc5c03dad.
.
tmux (2.2~git20160206-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream snapshot, from Git commit 7669cfb330.
* debian/docs: use new merged example configuration file, the examples
directory has been removed upstream (closes: #644366, #648867).
Checksums-Sha1:
f333869541867cf0e556f4e288349703f32b41be 1909 tmux_2.2-1~bpo8+1.dsc
5094da40b87a9b99771e394e81447a93cec14fb5 12108 tmux_2.2-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
ce6475dcb02021e1a064c1b300c2d9f87195f1a3 259112 tmux_2.2-1~bpo8+1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
27ad698b6384cb06ce34a66e1d6866cb568065fd1b92c77df1bae7318e2d3e36 1909 tmux_2.2-1~bpo8+1.dsc
9b3ca9e291524176c8861e41a8440069160d95016d887f0ca174e117ef6ba905 12108 tmux_2.2-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
da1e97b80cd79b3327f4ef013caade3f8e1bd575e1e8a65fd071455eb7c1f385 259112 tmux_2.2-1~bpo8+1_amd64.deb
Files:
898259d06b5afc01347d7629a377c7ed 1909 admin optional tmux_2.2-1~bpo8+1.dsc
afe777651daf6f6a871e4cb57ad437a1 12108 admin optional tmux_2.2-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
f1a9337db0d3a7e3bc90adeb7c826dca 259112 admin optional tmux_2.2-1~bpo8+1_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=Vfb/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: