[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

ltspfs_1.1-2~bpo60+1_i386.changes is NEW



(new) ltspfs_1.1-2~bpo60+1.debian.tar.gz optional net
(new) ltspfs_1.1-2~bpo60+1.dsc optional net
(new) ltspfs_1.1-2~bpo60+1_i386.deb optional net
Fuse based remote filesystem for LTSP thin clients
 LtspFS is a remote filesystem consisting of two parts:
 1) A network server daemon that runs on the LTSP terminal.
 2) A FUSE module that runs in userspace on the server, that connects with
 the daemon on the client.
 .
 This package contains the userspace parts for the LTSP server.
(new) ltspfs_1.1.orig.tar.gz optional net
(new) ltspfsd-core_1.1-2~bpo60+1_i386.deb optional net
Fuse based remote filesystem daemon for LTSP thin clients
 LtspFS is a remote filesystem consisting of two parts:
 1) A network server daemon that runs on the LTSP terminal.
 2) A FUSE module that runs in userspace on the server, that connects with
 the daemon on the client.
 .
 This package contains the daemon and other binaries to be run on LTSP thin
 clients.
(new) ltspfsd_1.1-2~bpo60+1_all.deb optional net
Fuse based remote filesystem hooks for LTSP thin clients
 LtspFS is a remote filesystem consisting of two parts:
 1) A network server daemon that runs on the LTSP terminal.
 2) A FUSE module that runs in userspace on the server, that connects with
 the daemon on the client.
 .
 This package contains hooks to automount devices in LTSP sessions,
 specifically logins using LDM.


Changes:
ltspfs (1.1-2~bpo60+1) squeeze-backports; urgency=low
 .
  * Rebuild for squeeze-backports.


Override entries for your package:

Announcing to debian-backports-changes@lists.debian.org


Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of
the override file.  It is ok otherwise, so please be patient.  New
packages are usually added to the override file about once a week.

You may have gotten the distribution wrong.  You'll get warnings above
if files already exist in other distributions.
xist in other distributions.


Reply to: