[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted ejabberd 2.0.1-5~bpo40+1 (source powerpc)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:20:02 +0100
Source: ejabberd
Binary: ejabberd
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.0.1-5~bpo40+1
Distribution: etch-backports
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org>
Changed-By: Gerfried Fuchs <rhonda@debian.at>
Description: 
 ejabberd   - Distributed, fault-tolerant Jabber/XMPP server written in Erlang
Closes: 501751
Changes: 
 ejabberd (2.0.1-5~bpo40+1) etch-backports; urgency=low
 .
   * Rebuild for etch-backports.
 .
 ejabberd (2.0.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added Brazilian Portuguese debconf templates translation
     (closes: #501751).
   * Protected hostname -s and hostname -d calls in postinst script to prevent
     its failure in case when hostname is incorrectly configured. It's harmless
     to replace hostname by "localhost" because it's used only for generating
     a reference SSL certificate which is to be replaced by a proper one.
   * Added option {keepalive, true} to ssl socket in LDAPS support patch.
     This helps not to loose long-term connections to LDAPS server (thanks
     to Alex Mauer for a suggestion).
Files: 
 3d21215e418ebbef5f2c830a263cab7d 812 net optional ejabberd_2.0.1-5~bpo40+1.dsc
 fdf9b0469dd0cf47b8c12c05d5cdb8d5 53632 net optional ejabberd_2.0.1-5~bpo40+1.diff.gz
 c302e2c732de9c2b000114cb0535f001 1169814 net optional ejabberd_2.0.1-5~bpo40+1_powerpc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkkEqMcACgkQELuA/Ba9d8YhsQCgleHz+oU0mmqxaaW17ACUOSzF
Jo4AoKVlmMmzdKt9IAeapiuijOTq0vXU
=9YwQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
ejabberd_2.0.1-5~bpo40+1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/ejabberd/ejabberd_2.0.1-5~bpo40+1.diff.gz
ejabberd_2.0.1-5~bpo40+1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/ejabberd/ejabberd_2.0.1-5~bpo40+1.dsc
ejabberd_2.0.1-5~bpo40+1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/e/ejabberd/ejabberd_2.0.1-5~bpo40+1_powerpc.deb


Reply to: