[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted syslog-ocaml 1.3-6~bpo40+2 (source amd64)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 14:47:08 +0200
Source: syslog-ocaml
Binary: libsyslog-ocaml libsyslog-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.3-6~bpo40+2
Distribution: etch-backports
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Romain Beauxis <toots@rastageeks.org>
Description: 
 libsyslog-ocaml - syslog routines for OCaml
 libsyslog-ocaml-dev - syslog routines for OCaml
Changes: 
 syslog-ocaml (1.3-6~bpo40+2) etch-backports; urgency=low
 .
   * Rebuild against ocaml 3.10.1
   * Updated build-dep accordingly
Files: 
 5057e176d927f15421b71adb648cfaf4 1282 devel optional syslog-ocaml_1.3-6~bpo40+2.dsc
 74df7eb7ea30f8727515e0ae46cd2b0d 4295 devel optional syslog-ocaml_1.3-6~bpo40+2.diff.gz
 21d9651e0ae6294686df1c8019c625b7 5138 libs optional libsyslog-ocaml_1.3-6~bpo40+2_amd64.deb
 d29d321895ae85a10e4c70ea05034137 18722 libdevel optional libsyslog-ocaml-dev_1.3-6~bpo40+2_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBSC7VEQC5aaocqV0ZAQL/NAf+JtE9Si6KOvJXAVvlx/2fSFnOFn4qeDt+
uehYnYmQPcEl6WqiQuL/BUkaXsYceYpaF+RepYS2umcWy7kZF9Og1fngawqih2oV
qSZgKRMtaJbPAr3oMXdzFSqKbc0VkDbkPuyJOY2oQCfkBbcg7SEs9GFt6z9z2kQs
7e8XeiesFt8Gh6NmoD7Ofmd8rTIFuSumAbZW2wIJQBMwEx+CMDXnX+0Sg8VZQFoo
hHM4j04mHooiLIuPPnoPiAUjJLMUcxblacpSyKaPhy83iyVGss7Etwgqd+o9Sy29
nmciA1pdqBtXrBQ1FMkEGwjK2sWChehKmw4u1Q8sM5VNcOX4Hwsy+g==
=ehu0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
libsyslog-ocaml-dev_1.3-6~bpo40+2_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/s/syslog-ocaml/libsyslog-ocaml-dev_1.3-6~bpo40+2_amd64.deb
libsyslog-ocaml_1.3-6~bpo40+2_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/s/syslog-ocaml/libsyslog-ocaml_1.3-6~bpo40+2_amd64.deb
syslog-ocaml_1.3-6~bpo40+2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/syslog-ocaml/syslog-ocaml_1.3-6~bpo40+2.diff.gz
syslog-ocaml_1.3-6~bpo40+2.dsc
  to pool/main/s/syslog-ocaml/syslog-ocaml_1.3-6~bpo40+2.dsc


Reply to: