[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted ocaml-ogg 0.1.1-3~bpo40+2 (source amd64)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 16:04:10 +0200
Source: ocaml-ogg
Binary: libogg-ocaml libogg-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.1.1-3~bpo40+2
Distribution: etch-backports
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Liquidsoap Debian Packaging <savonet-debian@lists.sourceforge.net>
Changed-By: Romain Beauxis <toots@rastageeks.org>
Description: 
 libogg-ocaml - OCaml bindings for the Ogg bitstream library
 libogg-ocaml-dev - OCaml bindings for the Ogg bitstream library
Changes: 
 ocaml-ogg (0.1.1-3~bpo40+2) etch-backports; urgency=low
 .
   * Tightened build dependencies on ocaml-nox and ocaml-findlib
Files: 
 efe1d473c6a31ef1eba391c9fb379ebe 1098 devel optional ocaml-ogg_0.1.1-3~bpo40+2.dsc
 306a09d3d6a079962180b393d3d84677 2616 devel optional ocaml-ogg_0.1.1-3~bpo40+2.diff.gz
 5795f55dcb2e4b49ac9b931c364cd94c 5778 libs optional libogg-ocaml_0.1.1-3~bpo40+2_amd64.deb
 199bd25dfdf023554dd3b3c88527e3d3 9078 libdevel optional libogg-ocaml-dev_0.1.1-3~bpo40+2_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBSCmgMwC5aaocqV0ZAQKzDAf9GZ1z79HdfhpKeejUlmn4+8JJE6PRcWvM
XljxOQhsuZSo5iBo7VyEN/q0czWzga2mFAj/nBMy+8M3fisUD+BsgtDTOkM1tNoP
WHe7JaUY+PabXtXcugD06pvexGUr0rR+WZazEcct1F3IYddIQwuU8GG4x3y0g3MG
KwvYLvWCyuqzI5I0mZKaENJYWEJuk3H1aMe4Kjd89X8jPTTOtELHnkc9Nou00/zi
uVOzwQd19Q/iE8rA1a221vqetnlnpwTDxjCh7FPB45CiWXwjtQCEUdSHpb17Lg/R
ArBlr9gxmJP8ht5pubxlVUEMGGVT23RjJ0q/xPZh8nDN7jUyDavLnQ==
=mfBw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
libogg-ocaml-dev_0.1.1-3~bpo40+2_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/o/ocaml-ogg/libogg-ocaml-dev_0.1.1-3~bpo40+2_amd64.deb
libogg-ocaml_0.1.1-3~bpo40+2_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/o/ocaml-ogg/libogg-ocaml_0.1.1-3~bpo40+2_amd64.deb
ocaml-ogg_0.1.1-3~bpo40+2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/ocaml-ogg/ocaml-ogg_0.1.1-3~bpo40+2.diff.gz
ocaml-ogg_0.1.1-3~bpo40+2.dsc
  to pool/main/o/ocaml-ogg/ocaml-ogg_0.1.1-3~bpo40+2.dsc


Reply to: