[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted bitlbee 1.0.2-1bpo1 (source i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:14:35 +0200
Source: bitlbee
Binary: bitlbee
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.2-1bpo1
Distribution: sarge-backports
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wilmer van der Gaast <wilmer@gaast.net>
Changed-By: Norbert Tretkowski <nobse@backports.org>
Description: 
 bitlbee    - An IRC to other chat networks gateway
Closes: 349570 350463 361503
Changes: 
 bitlbee (1.0.2-1bpo1) sarge-backports; urgency=low
 .
   * Rebuilt for sarge.
 .
 bitlbee (1.0.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added a po-debconf build-dependency, which I forgot when removing the
     Woody hack from 1.0.2-1. (Closes: #361503)
 .
 bitlbee (1.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * Avoids calling update-inetd if it's unavailable. (Closes: #350463)
   * Also using userdel instead of deluser now to avoid another bug. :-)
   * Only creates an inetd.conf entry when installing for the first time.
     (Closes: #349570) (This unfortunately breaks dpkg-reconfigure, but at
     least there's a warning...)
Files: 
 1d32b5ec60493c0ce7118e3007c0ec3e 709 net optional bitlbee_1.0.2-1bpo1.dsc
 ead4433fca9444cb61d478f1af2a79dd 448459 net optional bitlbee_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz
 7e9177f2066581045466a386fd182cb4 26095 net optional bitlbee_1.0.2-1bpo1.diff.gz
 123e064505a00c81b2b5375bfe38b708 319472 net optional bitlbee_1.0.2-1bpo1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFER5BYr/RnCw96jQERArtyAJ9pqcb3rE0M0MMXRWjqtUvuPXQJigCfTKhD
6fDMN7ErT1smOCMo5jfi4RU=
=ajsD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
bitlbee_1.0.2-1bpo1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/b/bitlbee/bitlbee_1.0.2-1bpo1.diff.gz
bitlbee_1.0.2-1bpo1.dsc
  to pool/main/b/bitlbee/bitlbee_1.0.2-1bpo1.dsc
bitlbee_1.0.2-1bpo1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/b/bitlbee/bitlbee_1.0.2-1bpo1_i386.deb
bitlbee_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/b/bitlbee/bitlbee_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: