calcepth-update (help needed)

[Attila Kovacs <attipaci@gmail.com>]

Hi Thorsten,


I've updated calceph on salsa to the latest upstream release (4.0.3).

The new upstream has added man pages (based on my request), which I hace 
added to the package.

However, the salsa reprotest pipeline fails, but I'm not sure why based 
on the logs. Maybe you can help sort it out.

Thanks in advance,


-- Attila.


On 11/19/24 12:05 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi Attila,
>
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2024, Attila Kovacs wrote:
>
> > I finally resolved it. The library version was missing inside the 
> > symbols file. Now both lintian and piuparts are happy. I'm happy too. 
> > :-)
>
> this is great :-).
>
> I am almost happy as well. I have no idea what the python message 
> means, so yes, I guess this can be ignored. I had the impression that 
> you are involved with upstream, but as you are not, the man pages can 
> be left alone.
>
> Though the examples are important, lintian now complains:
>  I: libcalceph-dev: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 4330kB 99%
> Maybe you can replace the data files with some README, where you 
> explain that they are to big and can be found in upstreams repository 
> at URL-xxx.
>
> The comment for the source-is-missing-override is not quite correct. 
> Even if the binary file is only distributed in the source package, it 
> must be availabe as source (please have a look at the reject-FAQ[1] 
> section "Source package missing source")
> Today I learned that mex files are indeed created by mkoctfile from 
> some c-file. mkoctfile is available in liboctave-dev, so everything 
> (except the comment) is fine.
>
>   Thorsten
>
> [1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html