supernovas package is ready for review

[Attila Kovacs <attipaci@gmail.com>]

Hi DebianAstro,


The supernovas package is nor ready for review, and is seeking a sponsor 
to move on. :-)

I did my best to follow all the guides I could find to conform with the 
packaging requirements for libraries. I took a small exception with the 
non-identical (but similar!) naming of the package vs the libraries 
contained therein, but I hope that's forgivable (the documentations 
encourage the same naming, but do not seem to require it, and I know 
that there are other libs that take that exception also, like 'cfitsio').

The salsa CI passes. (Well, the arm64 cross build still has issues with 
getting build dependencies installed -- but someone seems to be already 
on it, because the issues keep getting fewer. I'm impressed with whoever 
is maintaining the pipeline, because that is some excellent quick work 
there! - Yay!)

I have, in parallel, prepared a Fedora package also, with essentially 
the same packaging and contents. That too is currently under review. 
Between feedback and recommendations I will get here and there, I'd like 
them to keep them reconciled so that users can expect the same thing 
across different distros. It might mean some more back-and-forth, but 
it's for a good cause, and I hope you won't mind.

Thanks for all the help already and for what is yet to come.

cheers,

-- Attila.