Hello Vagrant,in the meantime I did a build at amdahl.debian.org and can't reproduce the problem too.
i did it with this package https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/armhf/csvjdbc.html
Dates are 2022-06-08 as expected and not 1970-01-03 as described at tests.rb.o.
There are many other packages with this problem in the java-team.Do you have an idea, how I can help to fix it. Can I have a (temporaly) access to reproduce the problem and then maybe to fix it.
Kind regards Mechtilde Am 21.05.24 um 19:20 schrieb Vagrant Cascadian:
On 2024-05-20, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:I want to clean up my Java packages. There are several with FTBR. I found that the day of the *.poms s a date from 1970. for example they are the packages vinnieLooking at the history for vinnie: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/armhf/vinnie.html It is only very recently that this started happening (2024-05-04) without source changes in vinnie itself, so I would suspect some change in the toolchain used to produce the .pom files? commons-email is similar, although starting 2024-04-04: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/armhf/commons-email.html ez-vcard is similar too, starting 2024-04-20: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/trixie/armhf/diffoscope-results/ez-vcard.html Although some of those builds also have differences in some xz contents... might just be related to the timestamp differences. Wild hunch is one build is run on a 64-bit kernel (without a linux32 personality) and one build on a 32-bit kernel... that is one of the main differences between these armhf test builds and builds on other architectures, where this does not seem to happen... live well, vagrant
-- Mechtilde Stehmann ## Debian Developer ## PGP encryption welcome ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature