debian-arm Jan 2024 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Uwe Kleine-König

Re: AR9271 Raspberry Pi 2B Jan 09

Adrian Bunk

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 11

Alan Corey

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 12
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 12

Andrew M.A. Cater

Re: AR9271 Raspberry Pi 2B Jan 07

Arnd Bergmann

Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Jan 19
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Jan 10

Aurelien Jarno

Re: RM: icinga2 [armel mips64el ppc64el riscv64] -- ROM; FTBFS Jan 02
Re: Bug#1061063: armhf: h5py's tests expose unaligned memory accesses during the build Jan 17
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 11
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 13

Bastian Blank

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 12
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 11
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Jan 19
What to do with d-i on armel? Jan 07
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 13
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 11
Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Jan 10
Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 11

Ben Hutchings

Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Jan 17

Dimitri John Ledkov

Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Jan 10
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 13
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 11

Emanuele Rocca

Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Jan 09
Re: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100) Jan 12
Bug#1061370: gcc-14 ftbfs on armel Jan 24

gene heskett

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 12
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Jan 09

gestos@ftp83plus.net

Re: Nouvel employé Jan 04

Hank Barta

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 12

Jeffrey Walton

Re: RM: icinga2 [armel mips64el ppc64el riscv64] -- ROM; FTBFS Jan 03
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 11

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 11
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 11

John Wick

Joseph Parisien

Nouvel employé Jan 04

Julian Andres Klode

Re: Really enable -fstack-clash-protection on armhf/armel? Jan 08

Lucas Nussbaum

Re: Enabling -fstack-clash-protection for trixie [armhf rebuild] Jan 12

Martin

Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Jan 10
Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Jan 09

Mathieu Malaterre

Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100) Jan 12

Matthias Klose

Bug#1061370: gcc-14 ftbfs on armel Jan 23

Paul Wise

Re: Nouvel employé Jan 06

Peter Green

Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Jan 10

rhys

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 12
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 12

Sebastiaan Couwenberg

Re: RM: icinga2 [armel mips64el ppc64el riscv64] -- ROM; FTBFS Jan 03

Simon McVittie

Bug#1060849: mesa: FTBFS on armel: static assertion failed: "vn_ring_shared requires lock-free 32-bit atomic_uint" Jan 15

YunQiang Su

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jan 12

The last update was on 09:00 GMT Wed Jan 24. There are 51 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc