Re: another attempt at Y2038

[Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>]

Hi,

On 2022-10-18 12:48, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Attempt #2: reproducible
> 
> My other favourite QA tool is reproducible builds. So how about building
> and comparing binary packages?
> 
> Unfortunately, build flags participate in build ids. That directly
> implies a high risk of false positives and/or manual work.
> 
> Without further ado, here we go.
> 
> .debs unchanged:
>  * base-files
>  * db-defaults
>  * coreutils

coreutils 9.1 enables y2038 support by default if available, so this is
actually expected.

Regards
Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net