Re: another attempt at Y2038
Hi,
On 2022-10-18 12:48, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Attempt #2: reproducible
>
> My other favourite QA tool is reproducible builds. So how about building
> and comparing binary packages?
>
> Unfortunately, build flags participate in build ids. That directly
> implies a high risk of false positives and/or manual work.
>
> Without further ado, here we go.
>
> .debs unchanged:
> * base-files
> * db-defaults
> * coreutils
coreutils 9.1 enables y2038 support by default if available, so this is
actually expected.
Regards
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Reply to: