On Feb 11, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@linaro.org> wrote: > I agree that changing the i386 port is probably a bad idea at the moment, > let's see how the armhf port turns out and fix all the bugs first, as this > is clearly needed anyway. Once there is a working armhf version with > full time64 user space, there can be a separate discussion about what > to do with the i386 port (phase out i386 before y2038, migrate all of > i386 to time64 quickly, have two separate i386 ports, or something > else). I have still not seen any explanation about why we expect that 32 bit ARM systems will still be popular (as non-embedded) ~15 years from now. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature