Re: Summary of the Arm ports BoF at DC18
- To: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
- Cc: debian-arm@lists.debian.org, debian-ci@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Summary of the Arm ports BoF at DC18
- From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 20:40:23 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20181111184023.GP18621@localhost>
- In-reply-to: <20181028170105.thoho3sggochmwgg@tack.einval.com>
- References: <20180920151523.apclhlhp4zx3gsdy@tack.einval.com> <20180920100518.llarn76rnpft55cb@layer-acht.org> <20180920203914.byomxr2dxl6jvzq6@tack.einval.com> <fa42b844-6248-797b-7709-68f88a1a34ac@debian.org> <20181028170105.thoho3sggochmwgg@tack.einval.com>
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 05:01:05PM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>...
> Hardware setup: I've configured the earlier 3 as buildds in little 1U
> cases with 32GiB RAM and mirrored SSDs, but for $reasons they're not
> yet installed and running. I'm assuming that a similar spec would be
> wanted for autopkgtest/ci
>...
One thing that might be worth considering would be using one or more of
the old Marvell buildds for armhf autopkgtest.
Otherwise it will become pretty hard to keep a non-NEON armhf baseline
for bullseye when these are no longer visible on the buildds.
I am aware of the problems with the old hardware and that this would
not be a long-term solution, but for some time it could help with that.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
Reply to: