Re: Any chance to provide upstream access to armhf machine thats comparable to our autobuilder?

[peter green <plugwash@p10link.net>]

On 13/12/16 07:37, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when discussing bug #800469 upstream thinks that armhf should work and
> the question came up whether there is some chance to access an armhf
> machine that is comparable to our autobuilders.
>    
The porterbox abel.debian.org runs the same hardware as the buildds and 
has both armel and armhf chroots available.

There is a procedure for guest accounts on porterboxes, though I haven't 
used it myself so I don't know how well it works in practice.