Any chance to provide upstream access to armhf machine thats comparable to our autobuilder?
Hi,
when discussing bug #800469 upstream thinks that armhf should work and
the question came up whether there is some chance to access an armhf
machine that is comparable to our autobuilders.
Kind regards
Andreas.
----- Forwarded message from daviesrob <notifications@github.com> -----
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:13:28 -0800
From: daviesrob <notifications@github.com>
To: samtools/htslib <htslib@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>, Comment <comment@noreply.github.com>
Subject: Re: [samtools/htslib] Support for mips/mipsel (#99)
Actually armhf is little-endian, so it should in theory work fine. And in fact when I last tried it using qemu (so not a _real_ armhf machine) it worked for me. See https://github.com/samtools/samtools/issues/612
If we can get into your build system and can have a poke around we might be able to find out what's going on. Without that, we're a bit stuck until we can get something to test on.
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/samtools/htslib/pull/99#issuecomment-266584017
----- End forwarded message -----
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: