Re: Which port for armv4l?
> In principle this would work fine. But if it worked then debian armel
> would already be built this way (we didn't _want_ to drop strongARM
> support). The problem is that the compiler, when outputting code for
> EABI (armel), does not support armv4, (due to boring stuff about thumb
> interworking, atomics and the BX instruction). It's all documented
> somewhere, probably in the those links that NeilW sent.
In the OP's case it might indeed be a problem. But I'm interested in
the more general case of catering to Gentoo-ish desires to compile
specific packages with particular flags/options.
Stefan
Reply to: