Re: Re: Re: Re: [Reproducible-builds] Raspi 3 suitable for arm64
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Ronald Maas wrote:
> There was a presentation at the last Linaro Connect by someone working on
> Centos. He specifically discussed the specific addition on the BSD license
> related to the FAT driver. Furthermore he mentioned that the Red Hat /
> Centos legal team reviewed this and found no concern for including Tianocore
> as part of Centos (and I assume Red Hat too as both products are very
> similar).
Interesting considering it isn't allowed to be in Fedora:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Testing_secureboot_with_KVM#EDK2_Licensing_Issues
> Note ARM64 version of Centos has a hard requirement on SBSA /SBBR
> compliance, so that probably explains their motivation to include Tianocore
> in the distribution.
Indeed, that is the likely explanation.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: