Re: Help with the arm64 and ppc64el installation-guides needed
- To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Cc: Holger Wansing <linux@wansing-online.de>, Breno Leitao <brenohl@br.ibm.com>, Karsten Merker <merker@debian.org>, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org, Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>, Steve McIntyre <93sam@debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Help with the arm64 and ppc64el installation-guides needed
- From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 22:04:02 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20150412200402.GL2969@type>
- Mail-followup-to: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>, Holger Wansing <linux@wansing-online.de>, Breno Leitao <brenohl@br.ibm.com>, Karsten Merker <merker@debian.org>, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org, Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>, Steve McIntyre <93sam@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1428866849.29665.48.camel@decadent.org.uk>
- References: <[🔎] 20150409161350.GB28121@excalibur.cnev.de> <[🔎] 55283611.7000003@br.ibm.com> <[🔎] 20150410222458.GD4008@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <[🔎] 20150411100126.b62e9543f4975d4a861b324e@wansing-online.de> <[🔎] 20150411171306.9e9076960f395bea2eae67ee@wansing-online.de> <[🔎] 20150411202249.d840b1199c45e272a4316a14@wansing-online.de> <[🔎] 1428795333.29665.30.camel@decadent.org.uk> <[🔎] 20150412184535.GH2969@type> <[🔎] 1428866849.29665.48.camel@decadent.org.uk>
Ben Hutchings, le Sun 12 Apr 2015 20:27:29 +0100, a écrit :
> On Sun, 2015-04-12 at 20:45 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Ben Hutchings, le Sun 12 Apr 2015 00:35:33 +0100, a écrit :
> > > On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 20:22 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > > > supports-smp-sometimes - that generation of cpu will most likely
> > > > fully support smp, right?
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > Yes.
> >
> > That's not the question here, see the bit of documentation that it
> > enables: it's whether the *kernel* supports SMP by default, through
> > SMP-alternatives, in a separate image, or not in any shipped image.
>
> There is only one kernel flavour, which of course supports SMP. I don't
> think SMP-alternatives exist on anything but x86 and ARM, unfortunately.
Ok, thanks.
> By the way, is this correctly documented for armhf? Both of the armhf
> kernel flavours support SMP with SMP-alternatives.
Apparently nobody updated build/arch-options/armhf in that regard. Note
that smp_config_section and smp_config_option should also be set (they
are the section and option that should be used to enable SMP when
configuring Linux).
Samuel
Reply to: