Re: Bug#764732: gcc-4.9: broken -O2 optimizations on armhf
Control: tags -1 + help
this is not seen on the gcc-4.9 Linaro branch, so a ARM porter should identify
the relevant backport.
On 12/25/2014 06:12 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> the escalation is wrong. there exist several workarounds for it (lowering the
> optimization, using gcc-4.8, ...). I asked the ARM porters to address this
> properly (Hector on IRC agreed to forward this), however I don't see any
> progress here. Now CCing debian-arm explicitly.
>
> On 12/23/2014 11:48 AM, Santiago Vila wrote:
>> severity 764732 serious
>> thanks
>>
>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Hector Oron wrote:
>>
>>> Package: gcc-4.9
>>> Version: 4.9.1-16
>>> Severity: important
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Found a FTBFS while trying to build unzip package in Debian/sid on armhf host.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> Yesterday, I uploaded unzip 6.0-13 fixing several security bugs, but
>> it will not migrate to testing because of this, which has just been
>> reported against unzip as Bug #773785.
>>
>> Since this is really a gcc bug, I'm raising the severity accordingly.
>>
>> Please tell me about the likelihood that this is indeed fixed in gcc,
>> because if it's low I will have to look for a workaround in unzip
>> (such as lowering the optimization level).
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>
Reply to: