[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal to replace/extend current armhf builders



peter green wrote:
Steve McIntyre wrote:
if we're happy that they're stable and supportable.
Having had a 2GB nitrogen6x running as a raspbian buildd for a while I would consider it "stable and supportable". We did have some crashes on both the nitrogen6x and the wandboard quad caused by the eglibc testsuite in the past but since upgrading to 3.11.0-armv7-x13 that seems to have stopped happening.
For the record some news on the raspbian imx6 based autobuilders

Bad: two buildds (both wandboard quads) running robert nelson's 3.11.0-armv7-x13 crashed while trying to build the latest iceweasel Good: these crashes prompted me to upgrade to the 3.13 kernel from experimental (compiled locally because the debian autobuilders haven't built it yet) on the raspbian build cluster which I can now confirm boots successfully and brings up all the hardware needed for autobuilding on both the 2GB nitrogen6x and the wandboard quads. After the kernel upgrade one of the wandboards built the new iceweasel without crashing.
Ugly: reconfiguring u-boot to load the initrd was a pain.

Other than the two crashes with the new iceweasel I don't recall having any crashes in quite some time.


Reply to: