Re: gcc armel status and armel architecture defaults
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Are the armv4t defaults still needed, or would it be
> better to default to some newer arm version like armv5t?
There is one Debian derivative, QtMoko, which is one of the few usable
distributions on the Openmoko Freerunner (gta02). Switching to armv5t
would mean they would have to either drop gta02 support or maintain
the old port themselves.
Added the maintainer of QtMoko to CC.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: