Re: Removing armel from the list of arches we build for

nvm, I guess unstable binutils is up to date

binutils (2.23.52.20130727-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream snapshot.

 -- Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>  Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:37:11 +0200

binutils (2.23.52.20130722-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream snapshot.
    - Fix PR ld/15762, glibc being built without warning sections.
  * Set the libdir for arm64 to lib, not lib64.
  * Stop building the binutils-gold package, let binutils provide
    binutils-gold.  Packages requiring gold should explicity pass
    -fuse-ld=gold to the compiler, packages requiring the bfd linker
    should pass -fuse-ld=bfd to the compiler.
  * Refresh patches.

 -- Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>  Mon, 22 Jul 2013 21:13:32 +0200

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Shawn Landden <shawnlandden@gmail.com> wrote:

if using gold on armel <armv6, then you have to compile it yourself, as my patch for unaligned memory access in binutils-gold 2.23 only got merged July 17.

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15070

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors <timo.lindfors@iki.fi> wrote:

Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov@debian.org> writes:

> Currently the package uses the default, I tend to use binutils-gold on
> my personal builds.

That explains the memory problem. Is there some technical problem for
using gold also for the official builds?

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Archive: [🔎] 84txih7vc3.fsf@sauna.l.org" target="_blank">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 84txih7vc3.fsf@sauna.l.org

--

---
Shawn Landden
+1 360 389 3001 (SMS preferred)

---
Shawn Landden

+1 360 389 3001 (SMS preferred)