Re: Removing armel from the list of arches we build for
Em Qua, 2013-08-21 às 21:55 +0100, peter green escreveu:
> Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> I'm not sure i'd deem four failed builds (3 in sid, one in experimental)
> in the last two years to be "often".
> The latest experimental version failed on armel but it also failed on
> armhf (though admittedly in different ways, it seems that the armel one
> got killed on a timeout while the armhf one ran out of disk space).
I don't know where to look for this history, but I assure you the fact
that these builds failed (not only on armel, but on other arches) and
were a pain to get going had a huge impact on the number of uploads I
was willing to make over the last year.
I would like to keep webkitgtk more up-to-date on Debian but I fail to
gather enough motivation when I think of how many build failures caused
by lack of memory or disk space I'll have to deal with.
Gustavo Noronha Silva <email@example.com>