Re: Creating a hardfloat package
- To: Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com>
- Cc: "Jeremiah C. Foster" <jeremiah@jeremiahfoster.com>, debian-arm@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Creating a hardfloat package
- From: Konstantinos Margaritis <markos@genesi-usa.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 20:37:52 +0300
- Message-id: <BANLkTin9P0LCpxcq=8vPs+4shkQ=RnZQ6w@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <BANLkTinbFZX9H6DbFbTQmz81j4CfehZe=g@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20110413223918.GA18457@localhost> <BANLkTinjQyprPzJg5p8pYt9_+nn46e+o2w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinbFZX9H6DbFbTQmz81j4CfehZe=g@mail.gmail.com>
On 2 May 2011 02:08, Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com> wrote:
> If it gets the rest of the system building with maybe a small
> percentage -marm'd up (I
> am sure a few Ubuntu packages still do this) that is a more noble goal
> than blocking.
> All we need is a way of marking the package as -marm'd and still needs
> -mthumb'ing.
This is exactly what's happening on a number of packages (ffmpeg/libav being one
important one). hdf5 was also built with -marm on Ubuntu armel, as it failed the
build at some point -dunno if this is still the case, but it was a few
months ago.
But the real fix of course is to actually fix the broken asm code :)
Konstantinos
Reply to: